Saturday, December 30, 2006

So, I suppose it's obvious from the post about the headstall that Tonka wore a bridle and bit for the first time. It was pretty low-key. It took a while for him to be okay with that big strange leather thing going over his face, but then it was no biggie. The bit, however, was unwelcome. He actually seemed a little scared about it being in his mouth. I let him fiddle with it for a few minutes, then took it off. Soon I would like to put it in his mouth and then let him get used to it for a while, maybe do some other work while he wears it, or take him for a walk, so he can think of other things and then come back to the idea, etc.

The above picture is from tonight, when I was trying the new headstall on Danni. Tonka was convinced that just possibly that camera was a treat in disguise.

I traded the Old Timer headstall in for a different one. Will post pics when he wears it. I know it will fit him, and it will look nice, although it doesn't stand out like the other did. I wish the other had worked out, but in the end I had to admit that the browband was just too small, which put too much pressure on the back of the ears. This one is nice too. More conventional, with a browband knot and some rawhide and conchos to pretty it up.

Well, I must be off to bed! Need to get some rest in preparation for a long day tomorrow (hopefully with some horseplay involved), and much fun for New Year's Eve!

Tuesday, December 26, 2006

I got a new headstall, a kind I really like the look of, and I’m not sure I like it on my horses with a snaffle bit. I’ve been told by one person that it just doesn’t look right with a snaffle, it needs a shanked bit to look right, but I ride in a snaffle. Here are pictures. One of Tonka, who had never had a bit in his mouth before, thus the funny face, and it wasn’t adjusted quite right, the sides needed to come down farther to cover up the sides of the bit. The other is Danni, and I think I had it adjusted right on her, with the bit hidden better. I can take it back and get something more conventional, but I don’t know whether I should. I really like this type of bridle. But the more I look at it the more I wonder if it really does look stupid. (It’s going to look bad enough riding Danni in an English saddle with western tack otherwise, until I find a western saddle to fit her). What would you do? Take it back or keep it?

By the way, if you're reading both my horse blogs, sorry that the last few posts have been duplicate. Just want to make sure I cover all bases with these two. And I don't know why this is in bold...

Saturday, December 23, 2006

Here is an interesting Fall 2006 article from Cowboy Magazine by Dr.
Robert M. Miller DVM that I saw posted on an online group, but it is
also posted online at

"And They Call Us Horse Lovers"

By Robert M. Miller, DVM

The Nation was shocked when Barbaro broke down shortly after
leaving the gate at the Preakness. I saw the repaired fractures in
TIME magazine. What I think happened is that the sesamoid bone
fractured, a common injury. As a result, the fetlock collapses
causing the pastern bone to explode into multiple fragments, probably
with the next stride or two.

The last time the general public was exposed to a racetrack
tragedy like this was when the great filly, Ruffian, fractured; the
injury eventually resulting in her death.
The news media focuses on great champions like these, but what most
people don't realize is that such injuries are relatively common
occurrences in horse racing.
Part of the cause is that we have bred athletic power into our
racing breeds far exceeding what nature requires for the horse to
survive in its natural environment. All wild horses need to do is
outrun a big cat. We have selectively bred for speeds that the
anatomy of the horse cannot always cope with.
In addition, we train and race them long before they are mature.
The immature are often capable of spectacular athletic performance.
Every time I watch an Olympics and I see gymnasts as young as 13, 14
or 15 years of age, I wince at the thought of the damage I know is
occurring to some of their bodies. I started a year of gymnastics at
17 years of age, and I wasn't very good, but I still managed to do
damage that manifested itself many years later. Fortunately, I was
drafted into the Army at 18, which ended my gymnastic career.

Half a century ago, when I was cowboying, "colts" were started at
four years of age or older. Once in a while, one might be started as
a three-year-old.
Despite some very hard work, barring accidents, those ranch horses
were still sound and working into their 20's.
I'm not opposed to racing. It's a great sport and has motivated
mankind to produce truly great horse breeds. But I am opposed to any
practices which contribute to premature crippling of otherwise
healthy horses.

Some years ago, the annual convention of the American Association
of Equine Practitioners (A.A.E.P.) was held in Dallas. The same week,
the national cutting horse futurities were being held in nearby Fort
Worth. Three colleagues from Sweden told me that they wanted to see
the cutting horses.
So, one evening, after the day of scientific lectures had ended, I
accompanied the three Swedish vets to Fort Worth.
After watching several horses perform, the senior Swede, a professor
from the vet school in Upsula, Sweden, said, "This is incredible! It
must take many years to obtain such performance from a horse."
"But," I answered, "this is a futurity."
"I do not understand this word," he said.
"These are colts," I explained. "These are just three-year-olds. "
He looked shocked, turned to his companions and explained to them in
Swedish and then said to me in English, "I have only two comments:
One, it must take great skill to be able to train a horse to do this
in so brief a time. And, two, what is happening to their poor legs?"

Today, we have all sorts of futurities - reining, cutting, barrel
racing, etc. I have tried many times to get owners to postpone
arduous training to give the colt a chance to mature. Most of the
time, I was ignored.
The lure of winning something or making some money was too great
to resist. My strategy when the owner insisted on going ahead with
training and/or competition that I felt was premature was to
say, "That's okay. You go ahead. What you are doing is very good for
my business."

Why is it that the protests against over-using young horses come
primarily from the people who profit from such abuse - the
veterinarians? Is it because we best understand the trauma being
inflicted upon immature skeletons, joints, ligaments and tendons?
Just as I am not opposed to racing, if properly conducted, I am not
opposed to horse shows or competitive equine events.
Horse shows, like all livestock shows, were conceived of long ago to
"improve the breed". They were designed to demonstrate and reward the
people who were doing the best job of breeding, of selecting
bloodstock, and of creating superior bloodlines.
Unfortunately, human nature, vanity and greed have corrupted the
horse show industry.

We see grotesque caricatures of the original character of each
breed. Stock horses, the working ranch breeds, are shown in Western
Pleasure classes traveling in a manner that would drive a working
cowboy crazy. With lowered heads, going in a downhill manner, these
horses greatly magnify the forces placed upon the forelimbs. Once
again, good for us vets. It produces income, but the horses suffer.
The wonderful Tennessee Walking Horse is shod and shown in distorted
gaits that can only be called "grotesque".

If it weren't for the frequent veterinary checks, which are
mandatory, can you imagine how many endurance racing horses would die
because of their riders' consuming desire to win? I remember the
early endurance races.
Saddlebred, with surgically distorted tails, and gingered anuses, are
exhibited with the pupils of their eyes dilated with atropine.
How many people who sincerely consider themselves to be "horse
lovers" wean foals at three months of age, or even earlier, which
nature never intended?

How many horses, a gregarious species, spend their lives locked in
box stalls? How many horses in the U.S.A, like so much of our human
population, are damaged healthwise by excessive nutrition?
Such abuses exist in ever breed, every discipline, in every equine
sport. We need to step back and analyze what we are doing.
One of my clients was a prosperous, educated couple. They were very
congenial, and they owned three Quarter Horses. One day, they called
me to come to their home to worm their horses and check them over and
booster their vaccinations. When I arrived, I found only two horses,
so I asked where the third one was.

"Oh, he's in training as a reining horse, with ____________ " (a
successful and notoriously brutal trainer who also happened to be one
of my clients).
I said, "Oh, I see."
Then the wife said, "We know how cruel he is to the horses, but he
wins!" I never felt the same toward those people, again.
This same trainer (he's been dead for many years) once said to
me, "Doc, why can't you guys cut the tails on my horses? Why do you
make me drive 300 miles round trip to get my tails done?"
He was referring to the illicit surgical paralyzing of the tail,
common in reining horses so they can't switch their tails. ALL of the
horses in his barn had their tails cut.
I said, "Were you ever beaten in a show by a horse that you knew had
its tail cut?"
"Oh sure," he said. "Lots of times."
"Well," I told him, "I didn't cut the tail nor did my partners. We
won't do anything against the association rules."
This same guy, a world-class competitor, kept every horse in his barn
on Serpecil, a tranquilizer not approved by FDA for use in horses. I
have no idea where he got the drug, but somebody was selling it to

I believe that a conspiracy exists in the horse show industry. The
trainers are judges, and the judges are trainers. Too often, they
scratch each others' backs.
If Western Pleasure horses were shown as they were 50 or 60 years
ago, a good amateur could turn out a champion. But it takes a real
pro to produce the freaks seen in today's Western Pleasure classes.
And, after the horse goes back to the owner from the trainer and is
no longer winning, it has to go back to the trainer for a "tune-up".
A few days before I wrote this article, I got back from Bishop Mule
Days, a unique event I attend every year that has no equal anywhere
in the world. I had the pleasure of seeing Western Pleasure mules
that WERE NOT "peanut rollers".
The trend began some years ago, but the mule people balked at it and
ruled it out. GOOD FOR THEM! You see, to be a mule lover, you REALLY
gotta love horses!


This article originally appeared in the Fall 2006 edition of
<http://www.equine- reproduction. com/cgi-bin/ AX/
http://www.cowboyma gazi> Cowboy Magazine

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

Now that I can post pictures again, here are some of the $25 horses available during the December promotion. Of course, don't hold me to it, the horses could be adopted before you get there...

Friday, December 01, 2006

They are SO taunting me! The BLM sent me an email today about their December promotion. At the Burns Oregon corrals there are about 80 studs and geldings ages four and up that are available for $25! Plus of course any other horse for $125. And they'll haul them up to 400 miles one way for free! We're within that distance.

I was going to post a beautiful picture of some of the available horses, but I foolishly updated to the new and "improved" Blogger and cannot post pictures. Hopefully that will resolve itself in time.

Anyway, if you're looking for a wonderful smart horse, and have some training ability, maybe you ought to think about a mustang.